FileCurveGo Pro

FileCurve vs TinyPNG — Which Compresses Better?

2026-04-06·5 min read·✓ Tested 2026-04-06
Advertisement

TinyPNG is one of the most popular image compressors online. FileCurve is a privacy-first alternative that processes images in your browser. Here's an honest comparison of both tools.

Head-to-Head Comparison

FeatureFileCurveTinyPNG
Free images/monthUnlimited20
Max file size (free)50MB5MB
Files uploaded to serverNeverAlways
Formats supportedJPG, PNG, WebP, GIF, AVIFPNG, JPG, WebP
Other tools45+ (PDF, video, audio)Compression only
API availableComing soonYes
Works offlineYes (PWA)No

Compression Quality Comparison

TinyPNG uses a proprietary quantization algorithm that produces excellent results for PNG files — often reducing size by 70-80% losslessly. FileCurve uses browser-based compression with configurable quality settings.

In our testing: For PNG files, TinyPNG edges ahead in compression ratio. For JPEG, the difference is negligible at 80% quality setting. For WebP, results are comparable.

When to Use FileCurve

  • You need to compress more than 20 images per month
  • You have files larger than 5MB
  • Privacy is important (photos, ID documents, etc.)
  • You also need PDF, video, or audio tools

When to Use TinyPNG

  • You need the absolute best PNG compression ratio
  • You need API access for automated compression
  • You only compress a few images per month
Advertisement

FAQ

Is TinyPNG better than FileCurve for PNG compression?

TinyPNG's server-side algorithm can achieve slightly better PNG compression ratios. However, FileCurve has no file or usage limits and is fully private.

Which tool is better for privacy-sensitive images?

FileCurve. Images are never uploaded — all processing happens in your browser. TinyPNG uploads your files to their servers.

Does FileCurve have an API like TinyPNG?

Not yet. An API is on the FileCurve roadmap. For automated compression workflows, TinyPNG's API is currently the better option.